Lecture 11
Slide 1:
Hello again, and welcome to COM 333, Communicating through
Internet. Today - lecture number 11, “Online Higher Education and
the Internet.”
Slide 2:
Well, there’s a mini-revolution going on in academe -
as we call it, the academy. And this revolution involves delivering
courses and entire degree programs, as we’re well aware of, through the
Internet. It seems to be focused largely at first toward niche audiences
- that is, special groups of people that can be identified that otherwise
have not previously had ready access to the Internet. This is characterized
by extensive competition and an uncertain future for higher education.
The entry into higher ed by for-profit universities, for really the first
time on this scale certainly, in higher ed. There are questions about
the quality of education and about interaction with students. And
many of these issues we’ve already confronted in this class. So I
think we have an interesting perspective on some of the topics we’ll be
discussing today.
Slide 3:
Well, this revolution taking place in higher education
perhaps traces it’s roots all the way back to Socrates, Plato -- you know
the Socratic method, Socrates, in fact even, [was] critical of books.
The Socratic method is a way of teaching using questioning and Socrates
saw that scribes, of course long, long before the printing press, scribes
writing out books and making them available to students, might detract
from the creative and critical thinking of students; that is, if we put
the thinking in books, what will we ask the students to do? And so
even those thousands of years ago, there was a very question, a serious
question, about the use of media in facilitating the delivery of information
and the acquisition of learning. Well, five hundred years ago the
printing press became available and a huge revolution took place - and
it’s hard to imagine society now without print; that is, without books,
magazines, printed material, memos, all kinds of a variety of printed material.
Certainly it’s hard to imagine the university without textbooks… a university
without libraries, in the sense of those printed available books.
Well, over time and certainly earlier in this century, television and radio,
and compressed video became available and television was used early in
the 19…, well, in the mid part of this century to deliver courses.
You know Sunrise Semesters, some of you might remember, perhaps not, but
in any event, it’s, it was the delivery, initially by WNET, of online classes
that were aired over public television stations - back then called educational
television stations - at 6:00 a.m. And radio stations for a long
time have offered courses either on their main band or on the side-band
sub carrier. And compressed video -- perhaps some of you have participated
in classes that were kind of a closed-circuit videoconference for students
at a distance to take a class. Then along comes the Internet in the
1990’s and yet another medium for delivering material. But this,
this medium seems different. It has components of each of the above.
It has video, there’s potential for video. Radio, or audio just like
we’re experiencing at this very moment. But it’s a two-way medium.
Television and radio were not. Television and radio were largely
one way, with the delayed response from the student. Compressed video
did allow two-way among certain groups of students, but certainly, one
couldn’t cover a country, or reach international audiences using compressed
video.
Slide 4:
Niche audiences. Higher education to date has not
reached, fully reached, professionals. You know, K-12 education is
out there and reaches almost everybody, but higher education, in fact,
has not reached those professionals who are employed, who work a full day,
perhaps have a family, etc., and are not available to move in residence
onto a campus to take courses. And travelers, those persons who are
always on the move, flying to the orient and flying to Europe and elsewhere.
Always on the move, to Africa and Asia, those professionals just weren’t
available on a regular time schedule to take a class on Wednesdays and
Fridays, or Mondays and Wednesdays and Fridays, etc. And then the
rural users, those persons who had to tend to the farm and who had these
kind of cyclical responsibilities that cut into each semester and kept
these persons from pursuing higher education. Family heads, those
who had responsibilities for children and those obligations, either because
of the expense of childcare, or time demands, or other special requirements,
were not as available. And relatively few international campuses
have been built. There are some, but relatively few. So for
a college or university to reach a truly international audience, it was
relatively rare. And I think we can look at these audiences in two
contexts. One is place-bound -- that is, individuals who for one
reason or another could not easily leave their community, and there was
not access to higher education in their physical community -- and those
that were time bound -- those who had time restrictions that did not allow
them to access material or to access courses elsewhere.
Slide 5:
Well, competition is certainly a key word when we talk
about higher education online. And the scenario is this -- what if
Harvard moved, all of a sudden, in overnight, or one semester moved to
your state and, in fact, right to your town. Well, right now, of
course, MIT, Stanford, U of I, the University of Michigan, and on, and
on, and on. And hundreds and hundreds of universities have in fact
done that, just that. They are at your town, they are available online
-- a local call to an Internet service provider and there you are taking
a class from Harvard, or from Stanford, or many of those hundreds of universities
that are available online. A notable new entry into the field, still
relatively small, is Jones International University. Important because
(1) it’s entirely online, does not offer any classes at a physical location,
and (2) it is a for-profit university. And it also (3) has full North
Central Association accreditation -- a fully accredited university, entirely
online. Much of the impact of this competition has not taken place
at the baccalaureate level -rather it tends to be at the master’s level,
at the M.A., M.S. level, less so at the doctoral level, although applied
doctorates are offered over the Internet, more so than the Ph.D.
Slide 6:
For profit universities… Again this is a relatively
new phenomenon that has been certainly accelerated, if not entirely initiated,
by the advent of the Internet. The University of Phoenix is one of
the largest private universities in the world, private universities.
It’s a for-profit university. They’re in the business to make money.
And it’s online initiative is really the bulk of its offering. There
are online courses available all over the world and certainly its taken
advantage of by many, many corporations and many, many professionals.
What’s happening with these for-profit universities is that they’re bringing
business practices to higher education and, let me tell you, from personal
experience, that really is a kind of revolution. They’re bringing
concepts of efficiency, of productivity; they’re putting the emphasis on
the product, not on the place. The emphasis is on what’s delivered
to the student. And in many cases, they hire adjunct faculty from
traditional universities. Sometimes this is considered raiding; that
is, they take the very universities they are competing with and hire their
faculty on a per-course basis and have those faculty members, while they
might reside at a prestigious traditional university, pay them several
thousand dollars to deliver a course online without actually leaving their
home campus, but delivering it online for the for-profit university.
Slide 7:
Well, questions have been raised about the quality of
education and certainly the future of higher education. There’s a
seminal study in this area by Zemsky and Massey. It’s one that takes
a look at the scenario of what online education is going to… how it’s going
to impact higher ed. Actually, the study published in 1995, came
up with the concept that products will become valued over producers.
You see, for so much of this century, it’s the producers, it’s the name
of the institution, a degree from the University of Illinois, a degree
from Harvard, or from Stanford, or Yale, or whatever, was valued very highly.
But now it seems that there’s a shift. A shift to the product - that
is, to get an M.B.A. is valued highly. To get a degree, whether or
not it be from a prestigious university, to get that degree is really what
is gaining more value. Zemsky and Massey conjectured that liberal
arts colleges would be less affected than the large research institutions.
In their theory, the liberal arts colleges will always be in demand for
the 18-year old high school graduates - you know, with the idea that those
students want an on-campus experience. They want to live on campus.
They want to interact with other students their age. They’re looking
forward to the social life, to the intellectual life, to those kinds of
rich environments that are created around a college campus. But the
large research institutions, where we have graduate schools, where many
of the students are in graduate study, may in fact have a shake-out because
the tuition generated by those graduate students may go away, or go away
in part, due to the competition from online universities. And the
efficiency that’s provided by these either for-profit universities, and
certainly the for-profit online universities, will appeal to legislatures
who will see that this is an opportunity perhaps to reduce costs, although
it certainly hasn’t been shown that it’s less expensive to deliver online,
but in any event, there seems to be that lure nevertheless. And taxpayers
will see it if there’s a potential to reduce higher education costs and
certainly tuition payers. If it were less expensive to pay tuition
at an online university, that would have some appeal. Or even if
it were not less expensive, but one did not have it to pay for the commute,
for the parking, for childcare while one is traveling to take a class,
those kinds of economies would certainly have some appeal to a segment
of those students who might potentially take classes.
Slide 8: Well, what price is paid by delivering online? Does one lose the campus environment? To what extent? And is interaction lost? You know, as we look at the WebBoard we’ve seen some interaction. It’s really up to you to compare that to the interaction which you’ve experienced inside classrooms, but the student-to-student interaction, the student-to-faculty, faculty-to-student interaction. What other losses are there by delivering courses on line? And it is inevitable that we have losses? Or are there ways to address those potential losses through this technology of the Internet?
Slide 9:
Well, in conclusion, there’s a huge revolution taking
place. Some universities in fact may suffer significant losses due
to that competition. Some may in fact shut down. Many new universities
have sprung up online, including those for-profit universities. It’s
up to you to decide whether there is quality, whether there is quality
in online education, what you see as the potential for online education,
and the desirability of taking a degree in this kind of asynchronous format,
the flexibility that we deal with every week in this class of not all having
to come on Tuesday nights to take a class, or Thursday, or Wednesday, or
whatever, but rather choosing your own time, day or night, to listen to
this lecture, and to participate in the WebBoard, and to visit the many
web sites. So, I look forward to our discussion on the WebBoard,
make sure you check in there. By the way, I did put up some information.
Some links regarding the Melissa virus, I’ll leave those up this week so
that you can see CERT. Remember it’s one of our glossary terms -
I think the “Computer Emergency Response Team”. CERT and their listing,
rather their citation, on the Melissa virus and you may find that of interest.
Well, in any event, have a good week and we’ll catch you on the Internet.