| Maximum
Points |
Excellent |
Adequate |
Poor |
| 10 |
Excellent
number and quality of online sources |
Adequate
number and quality of online sources |
Inadequate
number and quality of online sources |
| 10 |
Excellent
background, context, and idea development |
Adequate
background, context, and idea development |
Poor
background, context, and idea development |
|
10
|
Excellent discussion
of laws and public policy issues relevant to the topic |
Adequate discussion
of laws and public policy issues relevant to the topic |
Poor discussion
of laws and public policy issues relevant to the topic |
| 10 |
All
information is factually correct |
Most
information is factually correct |
Many
factual errors & inconsistencies |
| 10 |
Impressive
depth of insight and analysis |
Adequate
depth of insight and analysis |
Unexceptional
insight and analysis |
| 10 |
Excellent
discussion of detail |
Adequate
discussion of detail |
Vague
discussion of detail |
| 10 |
Excellent
participation in Phase 1 |
Adequate
participation in Phase 1 |
Poor
participation in Phase 1 |
| 10 |
Correct
grammar & spelling |
Few
grammar & spelling errors |
Many
grammar & spelling errors |
| 10 |
Correct
citation style |
Adequate
citation style |
Poor
citation style |
| 10 |
Clear
organization |
Adequate
organization |
Confusing
organization |